Tuesday, June 23, 2015

PreEmptive Solutions’ mobile application risk management portfolio: four releases in four weeks

Preventing IP theft, data loss, privacy violations, software piracy, and a growing list of other risks uniquely tied to the rise of enterprise mobile computing.


Enterprise mobile application risk

Mobile computing’s impact on society, our economy and the workplace is – and will continue to be – profound; there’s nothing controversial about that.

Yet, mobile technology – like the Internet and the PC “revolutions” that came before – cannot change everything.


Governance, risk, and compliance obligations will continue to frame – for better or for worse – every organization’s operational and strategic roadmaps.

Successful organizations innovate within these frameworks – effectively embracing new technology while preserving their standards for risk management, operational transparency, scale and resilience.

It is for these organizations – our traditional enterprise client-base – that PreEmptive Solutions offers, for the first time, its Mobile Application Risk Product Portfolio. The Mobile Portfolio includes preventative and detective controls – across both mobile applications and the backend services they rely upon – in a modular and extensible format.


Enterprise mobile application risk management


The infographic below identifies leading risk categories stemming from increased reliance on mobile applications. The vulnerabilities (potential gaps) call out specific tactics often employed by bad actors; the Controls identify the corresponding practices to mitigate these risks.

The bottom half of the infographic maps the capabilities of PreEmptive Solutions Mobile Application Risk Portfolio across platforms and runtimes and up to the risk categories themselves.


What’s new?

In the past four weeks, PreEmptive Solutions has filled out its mobile application portfolio with the following:
  1. PreEmptive Protection for iOS (PPiOS) – the first enterprise obfuscation solution for iOS applications fully integrated into Xcode, application performance optimizations, and our usual live technical support and continuously improving releases. The PPiOS User Guide can be seen here.
  2. Dotfuscator Professional Update – enhancements include deeper support for Windows 8.1, Windows Phone, and Xamarin obfuscation. Stay tuned for Windows 10 updates as they become available. You can see the latest change log here.
  3. DashO Update - enhancements include support for the latest Android releases and frameworks. The DashO change log is here.
  4. PreEmptive Analytics for Linux – extending feature and exception analytics from your IoT devices to your back office servers. Contact us for immediate access to our Linux SDK. 

The result is a comprehensive mobile application risk management and monitoring platform for the enterprise – extending across (and beyond) the mobile applications themselves.

Want to learn more about these products? Visit www.preemptive.com.

Not sure if your organization needs to better manage mobile application risk? Check out 6 signs that you may be overdue for a mobile application risk review.

6 signs that you may be overdue for a mobile application risk review

Every organization must ultimately make their own assessment as to the level of risk they are willing to tolerate – and mobile application risk is no exception to this rule.

Yet, given the rapidly changing mobile landscape (inside and outside of every enterprise), organizations need to plan on regular assessments of their mobile risk management policies – especially as their mobile applications grow in importance and complexity.

Here are 6 indicators that you may be overdue for a mobile application risk assessment.
  1. Earlier PC/on-premises equivalents ARE hardened and/or monitored. Perhaps these risks need to be managed on mobile devices too – or, conversely, the risks no longer need to be managed at all.
  2. Enterprise mobile apps are distributed through public app marketplaces like Google Play or iTunes. Using public marketplaces exposes apps to potentially hostile users and can be used as a platform to distribute counterfeit versions of those very same apps.
  3. Mobile apps are run within a BYOD infrastructure alongside apps and services outside of corporate control. Access to a device via third-party software can lead to a variety of malicious scenarios that include other apps (yours) installed on the same device.
  4. Mobile apps embed (or directly access) proprietary business logic. Reverse engineering is a straight forward exploit. Protect against IP theft while clearly signaling an expectation of ownership and control – which is often important during a penalty phase of a criminal and/or civil trial.
  5. Mobile apps access (or have access to) personally identifiable information (or other data governed by regulatory or compliance mandates). Understanding how services are called and data is managed within an app can readily expose potential vulnerabilities and unlock otherwise secure access to high-value services.
  6. Mobile apps play a material role in generating or managing revenue or other financial assets. High value assets or processes are a natural target for bad actors. Piracy, theft, and sabotage begins by targeting “weak links” in a revenue chain. An app is often the first target.
Want to know more about how PreEmptive Solutions can help reduce IP theft, data loss, privacy violations, software piracy, and other risks uniquely tied to the rise of enterprise mobile computing? 

Visit www.preemptive.com - or contact me here - i'd welcome the contact.

In the meantime, here’s an infographic identifying leading risk categories stemming from increased reliance on mobile applications. The vulnerabilities (potential gaps) call out specific tactics often employed by bad actors; the Controls identify corresponding practices to mitigate these risks.

The bottom half of the infographic maps the capabilities of PreEmptive Solutions Mobile Application Risk Portfolio across platforms and runtimes and up to the risk categories themselves.



















For more information on PreEmptive Solutions Enterprise Mobile Application Risk product portfolio, check out: PreEmptive Solutions’ mobile application risk management portfolio: four releases in four weeks.

Friday, June 19, 2015

ISV App Analytics: 3 patterns to improve quality, sales, and your roadmap

Application analytics are playing an increasingly important role in DevOps and Application Lifecycle Management more broadly – but ISV-specific use cases for application analytics have not gotten as much attention. ISV use cases – and by extension, the analytics patterns employed to support them – are unique. Three patterns described here are Beta, Trial, and Production builds. Clients and/or prospects using these “product versions” come with different expectations and hold different kinds of value to the ISV – and, as such – each instance of what is essentially the same application should be instrumented differently.

The case for injection

Typically, application instrumentation is implemented via APIs inside the application itself. While this approach offers the greatest control, any change requires a new branch or version of the app itself. With injection – the process of embedding instrumentation post-compile – the advantage is that you are able to introduce wholly different instrumentation patterns without having to rebuild or branch an application's code base.

The following illustration highlights the differences in instrumentation patterns across product version – patterns that we, at PreEmptive, use inside our own products.


Beta and/or Preview

  • Measure new key feature discovery and usage 
  • Track every exception that occurs throughout the beta cycle 
  • Measure impact and satisfaction of new use cases (value versus usage) 
  • *PreEmptive also injects “Shelf Life” – custom deactivation behaviors triggered by the end of the beta cycle 

Trial

  • License key allowing for tracking individual user activity in the context of the organization they represent (the prospective client) - this is CONNECTED to CRM records after the telemetry is delivered
  • Performance and quality metrics that are likely to influence outcome of a successful evaluation through better timed and more effective support calls 
  • Feature usage that suggest user-specific requirements – again, increasing the likelihood of a successful evaluation 
  • * Preemptive injects “Shelf Life” logic to automatically end evaluations (or extend them) based upon sales cycle 

Production

  • Enforce organization’s opt-in policy to ensure privacy and compliance. NO personally identifying information (PII) is collected in the case of PreEmptive’s production instrumentation. 
  • Feature usage, default setting, and runtime stack information to influence development roadmap and improve proactive support. 
  • Exception and performance metrics to improve service levels. 
  • * PreEmptive injects Shelf Life functionality to enforce annual subscription usage. 

The stakeholders and their requirements are often not well understood at the start of a development project (and often change over time). Specifically, sales and line of business management may not know their requirements until the product is closer to release – or after the release when there's greater insight into the sales process. A development team could not use an analytics API even if they had wanted to. …and this is one very strong case for using analytics injection over traditional APIs.

PreEmptive Solutions ISV application analytics examples

Here are recent screen grabs of Dotfuscator CE usage (preview release) inside Visual Studio 2015.
Here is a similar collection of analytics Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) – this time focusing on current user evaluations.



…and lastly, here are a set of representative KPIs tracking production usage of DashO for Java.


If you’re building software for sale – and you’d like to streamline your preview releases, shorten your sales cycles and increase your win rates – and better align your product roadmap with what your existing clients are actually doing – then application analytics should be a part of your business – and – most likely – injection as a means of instrumentation is for you as well.